Sunday, June 24, 2007

Looking-Glass Editions #2 choices... choices.. choices...

Well, the first of the affordable art editions seems to have got off to a reasonable start, so now I'm starting to think about what picture to chose for the second print edition (I'm coming around to thinking it would make sense to have four or so running in rotation at any one time - at which point I'm probably going to actually have to bite the bullet and put up a website).

Warning - wandering digression: One thing I have been reminded of in all this is that I find 8x10 to be a particularly unhelpful size. It's amazing how many prints just don't work in 8x10 (and one of the reason I've never really been a big fan of the Holy Grail of 8x10 contact prints). Now I've gone on at length in the past about the current trend towards mega-prints, which I happen to quite like most of the time. And I find that most photographs will often work very well around 11x14 up to 20x24 - it doesn't really matter too much. Some have a bit more impact at the bigger end but I find a broad range of my pictures work at these sizes. And the same also goes for smaller. I've had a practice of producing small postcard sized editions in different forms to send out to editors and curators and galleries and such. Again, I find a lot of photography works really well at this 4x6 or slightly bigger size - and yet move many of these up to 8x10 and - kinda blah - take them up to 11x14 or so and tra-la - good visual impact.

So, that's a rather roundabout way to say I've actually been having a hard time to find prints that work really well at 8x10. Some of my favourites just don't...

So, here are a few I've come up with so far. Let me know if you are really keen on one in particular for the next pick (or if there is one that would cause you never to come back to this blog again...)


I was thinking of this one "Slow Children" from Peripheral Vision - The Yellowknife Project. It looks pretty good as an 8x10, but then I remember I had another picture where I had changed lenses and perspective a bit and that I had never really printed up apart from a couple of test prints:


This one actually works really well as an 8x10. What do you think?

Another option would be to pick one more from my immersive landscapes - here are two which work well and that I like:



The one below actually works very well in 8x10




Or, (my own favourites, because it's what I'm working on right now) is one of these two from my Traces - alleyways & spandrels project. The second one, of course, is the one selected for the current
Humble Arts Foundation Group Show







Let me know. I'm not exactly going to be taking a vote, but I'm hoping to get an idea of what's what...

Saturday, June 23, 2007

HP's Z3100 photo printer - 17"??


A rare technical post - so tune out if you are as averse to them as I am on most other blogs...

That said, for years I have fiddled with Epson printers - used third party inks, loaded my own with syringes (and ruined a couple of good shirts in the process).

Finally the Epson 2400 (and its bigger brothers came along) and basically, as far as I was concerned it was plug and play. I get great colour when I need it, and on Crane Silver Rag I get excellent black and white prints. Though on the latter I'm pretty picky - most of the time the prints are 98.5% there - although they are as good as most of what I ever produced in the darkroom.

But then something comes along to spoil it all. HP has a range of pro printers, the Z2100 and Z3100 range and a smaller 13" sibling the Photosmart B9180. I've been hearing good things about these. Well, today I saw some black and white prints done on one and damn - they are 99.825% there. Basically they seem to do pretty much what I want - no complaints. A show printed up on one of these would just look great. Bugger.

Trouble is, I don't want another 13" printer when the one I have is going strong. And as much as it would be nice, a 24" or 48" is out of the question. But a 17" Z series prosumer printer along the lines of the Epson 3800 (or even 4800) would just hit the spot.

So come on Hewlett Packard - we're waiting - a good sized market of creative photographers. Heck, I'll even test drive it for you. I want to see what the picture up top (and many more) look like on the HP.

Okay, Online Photographer mode is now off for another few months and back to regular programming.

"Alec Soth on video" - Featured Comment - new american portraits


Popping back to the Alec Soth portraiture post, Claudio Cambon made the following comment which for me really got to the heart of things. He starts by affirming Soth's comments about the visceral experience of the 8x10 ground glass, but then goes on to comment on contemporary portraiture in general (though I don't think Soth in particular). He says - much more clearly and eloquently - pretty much what I was trying to say about contemporary portraiture way back here (the humdrum portraits trend), especially the part I have emphasised in the last paragraph:


"...I do love the "movie" feeling of the large ground glass; I feel like I'm in my own camera obscura, my own world, as Soth says... I also agree that a lot of the time portaits with smaller cameras are hard because the person doesn't know who to interact with more, you or the camera. Larger cameras definitely create a remove that allows a person to confess directly to the lens; in many situations minimizing one's own presence can really help.

I also agree that the photographs measure the distance between photographer and subject perhaps more than the subject itself, but ultimately I find many contemporary photographers too complacent about this distance. I feel it becomes a way to be safe, not to engage; it's too comfortable.

I should emphasize that I don't mind distance per se. I think, for example, that Walker Evans was a master at photographing both the social and class distance he felt from his subjects, which was huge, and at the same time the very personal sense of shock he felt at how they lived, which was overwhelming. That is why pictures such as the series for "Let Us Now Praise Famous Men" are at once almost icy in their gaze (Kirstein called it a "puritanical stare"), and at the same time so immediate and piercing for me. For being so far away and close at the same time, they are very honest pictures.

On the other hand much contemporary work that holds this distance doesn't elaborate on what that distance means for them. I feel like asking, "OK, so you feel removed, but what do feel about being removed?" I don't sense anything particular about it, be it dismay or nostalgia or desire or whatever; I'm not hearing the photographer's voice. There is little contact, or transgression, or crossing boundaries. The pictures are good, but somehow often not dynamic enough for me. Distance as a kind of objectivity doesn't bother me, but distance as neutrality does."

Admittedly, I haven't seen it in person, but I think this applies to many (though not by any means all) of the examples on the current hot A New American Portrait show at Jen Bekman Gallery (more here)

Friday, June 22, 2007

The Sea by John Banville


If you are looking for some good reading to take away to the beach/cottage/hacienda/Blofeld style mountain-top lair then The Sea by John Banville is a good pick.

Sure, it's a little bit melancholy and somewhat bitter sweet, but Banville's poetic way of writing (among other things, he seems to make up the odd word to express what he wants in a sort of Joycean way, though not nearly so relentlessly as Joyce) is at times quite magical, though always down to earth. The book is very evocative of place and - if you are at all interested in memory and how it works - Banville is a master of making memories both concrete and ephemeral at the same time. In many ways, his writing is quite "photographic" - I could often pretty much imagine the photographs that would illustrate the prose.

The Guardian has one of many good reviews - following is an extract (warning - the full Guardian review has a bit of a spoiler in it...):


"Max Morden, whose name points to death and, like the Northern line terminus, an end, is mourning the wife he has recently lost to cancer. He first love had also once stayed. Reconstruction through memory is Morden's drug: he binges on it and on grief, booze and writing. The sea is where his first love disappeared and where he is now disappearing. The sea is memory itself, its high rising tides are what threaten to drown the present and even the past. Like memory, the sea has a life of its own: at the close of the novel, Morden remembers a moment when a strange swell seemed to express the unacceptably cruel world: "the whole sea surged . . . Just another of the great world's shrugs of indifference."...

Banville writes novels of complex patterning, with grace, precision and timing, and there are wonderful digressive meditations. In The Sea we hear about work and mediocrity, how "Be yourself!" actually means "Be anyone you like", on how first love can put an end to the "immanence of all things" and turn the world "into an objective entity"....

In this scopic world, people become things. Morden prefers it that way: "What are living beings, compared to the enduring intensity of mere things?" It's not only the intensity of things that Morden likes perhaps, but the fact that they don't speak. In speech, living beings expect to be understood on their own terms. The sudden dramatic turn of Morden's memories hinges, it transpires, on a colossal misunderstanding, as we see at the novel's end..."



(Pagham Beach - Tim Atherton)

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Irving Penn in... inkjet



(Iceland Poppy/Papaver nudicaule (E), New York, 2006 digital pigment print with Epson UltraChrome Pigmented Inks on Crane's Museo Silver Rag paper, mounted to board 19 7/8 x 24 inches ©Irving Penn)

I've always really quite liked Irving Penn. I know he has his detractors - he's really just a fashion photographer fooling us he's an artists and so on. But watching what he has produced overt the years - and continues to produce into his 90's - you can't help but admire the creative mind and aesthetic sensibilities at work behind the camera.

(His frozen foods are just one example of something that was done pretty much before it's time and that you still find younger artists "making reference to" today)





Anyway, over on the LF list I saw a reference to Penn and Epson K3 inks... so I had to check it out. And true enough, earlier this year Pace/MacGill Gallery had a show of Penn's work (these beautifully "Pennesque" flowers among others) which not only had classic dye transfer prints and Platinum prints (remember this is the guy who pretty much re-introduced platinum printing to the photography world) but - horror of horrors - Epson Inkjet Pigment Prints - on the beautiful Silver Rag paper (ahem - the paper chosen for my print offer), as well as basic old Epson Enhanced Matte.



(Poppy: Barr's White, New York, 1968digital pigment print with UltraChrome Pigmented Inks on Epson Enhanced Matte paper, mounted to board19 1/2 x 17 1/2 inches ©Irving Penn)


From the Gallery: Pace/MacGill is pleased to present an exhibition of flower studies made by Irving Penn between 1967 and 2006. Penn has been working in this genre for over four decades, utilizing a variety of printing processes that meet his consistently high standards for quality. The show will feature a series of color close-ups printed with digital and dye-transfer methods as well as a black and white platinum print.

Without artifice or sentimentality, Penn’s flowers are statements of fact. Recording what is in front of his lens with as much fidelity as the camera allows, the photographs dissect each whorl and petal, each stem and stamen with the honesty of an X-Ray. Penn examines the topography and biological wonder of each specimen, many of which are in a state of decay. He makes note of the feathery skeleton of the Dandelion/Taraxacum officinale bearing the weight of droplets of water and the withering petals of Peony/Paenoia: Silver Dawn. Each browning, twisting flower is seen with cool objectivity.

Beyond the display of striking clarity, there are moments within each composition where Penn’s objective study becomes poetic contemplation. The passage of time is implicit in these images: the pink pigment drips from the tips of Tulip/Tulipa: China Pink and Iceland Poppy/Papaver nudicaule (C) is caught cocooning into itself. With subjects found at the penultimate moment before their expiration, Penn documents each flower’s vitality while speaking of its mortality.




(Dandelion/Taraxacum officinale, New York, c. 1973 digital pigment print with UltraChrome Pigmented Inks on Epson Enhanced Matte Paper, mounted to board22 x 17 3/16 inches © Irving Penn)


I'm pretty sure there's a few folks turning in their graves over this, as well as a few others who think it must be a sure sign of the End Times... But kudos to Pace/MacGill for being willing to actually show these (though I'd have to wonder if they actually had much choice in the matter!).

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Meeting Resistance - with the Insurgents in Iraq


There has been much comment about the role and place of journalists who are "em-bedded" with the US/Coalition forces in Iraq.

In this documentary Meeting Resistance, two western journalists - Steve Connors and Molly Bingham spent ten months filming the stories on the other side, of the Iraqi insurgents


I haven't seen the film yet (you can view a few sections here), but definitely want to track it down. Steve Connors is one of my oldest friends, who - as a photojournalist - photographed in Bosnia (if you recall the harrowing pictures of starving prisoners from Trnopolje and Omarska...) the war in Sri Lanka, Rwanda, the former Soviet Union and Afghanistan. I'd lost track of him over the last couple of years, so it was doubly interesting to find out what he was up to... (even if it seems partly insane!)

From the blurb:
MEETING RESISTANCE is a verité-style non-fiction feature-length film set in the streets, alleyways and ubiquitous teashops of the Adhamiya neighborhood of Baghdad. It enters the physical and psychological heart of the "insurgency" against the American occupation. Photojournalists/directors Steve Connors and Molly Bingham spent ten-months among the insurgents there to create this exclusive, unique, and at once horrifying, compelling and insightful film about their lives, motivation, and goals.

MEETING RESISTANCE focuses on eight "insurgents", each with his or her own tale and reasons for opposing the American-led occupation, yet all people who within days of the fall of Baghdad were arranging themselves into resistance cells, finding the money and weapons to fight against the American military. The film witnesses how they began to organize themselves, reveals why they have decided to violently oppose the occupation of the country, and hears in their words the underlying ideological foundations to their fight and how and why those have changed over time.



MEETING RESISTANCE is a fascinating journey through a tumultuous period with diverse members of the Iraqi resistance. Their personal stories as well as their ideological ones are at once dramatic, eye-opening, and concerning - and they challenge the notion that those opposing the occupation are simply "dead enders," "common criminals," "Al-Qaeda operatives" and "die-hard Ba'athis."
And you can listen to a very good MP3 interview here (50min) with Connors and Bingham

Affordable Art - UPDATE

For those all those who have so far ordered a print from the first Affordable Edition, they have either just been shipped or should ship today.

And if you haven't ordered yet (and they are going fast - so hurry), just click on the link in the sidebar ever here: -------->



Now, to figure, what shall I pick for the next one...?

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Alec Soth on video



Jen Bekman linked to three interesting little videos on Youtube about Alec Soth. Like JB, I especially like the third one on 8x10.


In October of 2004, photographer Alec Soth went on assignment for LIFE
magazine to capture weekend soldiers at an
Airsoft
military
simulation in Joelton, Tennessee.

In anticipation of his upcoming exhibition, filmmaker Mike Dust traveled alongside Soth for this three-day excursion, interviewing and shooting alongside him as he worked to capture images for, both the magazine shoot as well as for his personal work.

A number of these photographs (Odessa, Joelton, Tennessee, 2004 and Josh, Joelton, Tennessee, 2004) became part of the exhibition Alec Soth: Portraits at the Minneapolis Institute of Arts the following spring. The video piece created during that shoot was installed in the gallery as an accompaniment to the exhibition.

The video is broken into three segments entitled On Assignment, Portraiture, and The Ground Glass.




Alec Soth: Portraits – On Assignment (2:33, segment 1 of 3), 2005, Video, 8 minutes, produced and directed by Mike Dust, © 2005 National Projects



Alec Soth: Portraits – Portraiture (2:25, segment 2 of 3), 2005, Video, 8 minutes, produced and directed by Mike Dust, © 2005 National Projects



Alec Soth: Portraits – The Ground Glass (3:06, segment 3 of 3), 2005, Video, 8 minutes, produced and directed by Mike Dust, © 2005 National Projects

Group Show No. 16 - Humble Arts Foundation



Well, I'm extremely please to announce that I'm part of the current Group Show at the Humble Arts Foundation (who I discovered and discussed last month). They chose the picture above from my current Alleys project




It features the work of Monica, May, Ryan Pfluger, Bryan Lear, Rebecca Steele, Johnny Misheff, Mark Johnson, Mark Wise, Alexia Pike, Dave Anderson, Rachel Dunville, Liz Kuball, David Black, Sean Fader, Nguan, Phil Cooke, Susana Raab, Martina Salbi & Tim Atherton (bios here).





I've got to say, putting mine aside, there's some fantastic stuff in there. Here are a couple of tasters, but go and have a look for yourself





Monday, June 18, 2007

HP's slimming camera


Saturday Night Live once did a skit about one of the Slimming Cams on the Oprah show being broken. Now, thanks to HP, it's a reality

Thankfully there are already a few parodies of it floating around. But I bet this is going to sell like hotcakes

(via Joerg over on Conscientious who seems gobsmacked by it all...)

(from Gizmodo.com)

Peter Fraser's Two Blue Buckets etc


Peter Fraser's Two Blue Buckets and more... Fraser seems to have been getting some much deserved wider press recently (and here among others).

For me, he is definitely one of those artists whose work fits into the third of W.H. Auden's Five Verdicts: "I see that this is good and I don't like it but I understand that with perseverance I could come to like it" - although "don't like it" is a bit too strong (I need a verdict 5a) - more "I quite like it, but I don't really like it...".



Because I can certainly see what Fraser is doing and a some of probably why he is doing it. A lot of what he seems concerned with and how he sees echoes with many things in my own work and my approach to it.

"Fraser's color pictures, whether depicting a pair of banal blue buckets or the most technologically advanced X-ray beam splitter stall time, let things just be for a moment, in all the wonder of their thingness."
Johanna Burton



"Everything visible in the world can potentially be seen, but noticing it, giving it due attention, that is quite a
different matter.


In photography of serious ambition, the photographer’s subject is almost never simply the subject matter.

Working around the object…Looking to go beyond the object…

Making allusive photographs…Work that is less immediately willing to give up its secrets…"
Gerry Badger (quoted by Chris Patterson)


Fraser has new book published by Nazraeli Press which certainly looks appealing

Sunday, June 17, 2007

Looking-Glass Editions - Affordable Art for $25.00...


Well, I've decided to jump on the train (driven it seems by Jen Bekman...) while it's still slow moving and before it picks up too much momentum.

This picture is the first of my
affordable edition prints and is available for only US$25.00 until the edition of 100 is all sold out - This is art you can't not afford to buy

Willow #7, Tin Can Hill - from the
Immersive Landscapes - Boreal Forest/Precambrian Shield Project - is an 7 1/2"x9 1/2" pigment ink print on Silver Rag paper, signed and numbered on the reverse.

I'm following
Julian Thomas' model of 25x100 - only100 prints for 25.00 each. But there are of course the existing smaller "traditional" editions available in 11x14 and 20x24

This picture is already in a couple of major collections - The Getty Museum Research Institute in LA and the Provincial Art Collection of Alberta.

Simply click on the link in the sideabar to buy (25.00 + 10.50 shipping to wherever you are).
(If you are in Canada, email me at the link in the sidebar, as shipping is a bit cheaper. I will also take USPS International Money Orders - again, email for details. And let me know if the Paypal button isn't working - it seems a bit fussy to set up...)

Finally, it was a comment by the inimitable Luis Gottandi that got me going seriously on this:

"If for no other reason, this is a good idea in that it breaks through the dominant marketing conventions of the day. Yes, I hope it works and taps into a fringe segment of the market that has been waiting for a long time for such an opportunity.


A lot of potential buyers have had to make do with posters and/or sidewalk-show imagery, yet are educated, savvy and hunger for more.


The world of the arts merchants has encysted itself in its own drag shadow for decades now, and is, historically speaking, overly ripe for change."

And why Looking Glass Editions? Perhaps turning things topsy turvy like Alice... and of course every photograph is in some ways like a mirror - and sometimes we only see as in a glass, darkly.

Friday, June 15, 2007

"If it is art, it is not for all, and if it is for all, it is not art"


I came across this fun commentary in the introduction to the current Brick

"It is very regrettable that so many contemporary composers care so much about style and so little about idea. From this came such notions as the attempt to compose in ancient styles, using their mannerisms, limiting oneself to the little that one can thus express and to the insignificance of the musical configurations which can be produced with such equipment.

No one should give in to limitations other than those which are due to the limits of his talent. No violinist would play, even occasionally, with the wrong intonation to please lower musical tastes, no tight-rope walker would take steps in the wrong direction only for pleasure or for popular appeal, no chess master would make moves everyone could anticipate just to be agreeable (and thus allow his opponent to win), no mathematician would invent something new in mathematics just to flatter the masses who do not possess the specific mathematical way of thinking, and in the same manner, no artist, no poet, no philosopher and no musician whose thinking occurs in the highest sphere would degenerate into vulgarity in order to comply with a slogan such as "Art for All." Because if it is art, it is not for all, and if it is for all, it is not art."

Arnold Schoenberg




EMPTY DRAWING ROOM


Jorge Luis Borges on the gap between the photograph's deceptive and fading poignancy, and the vibrancy of even the most mundane present moment - the void between appearances and actuality:


EMPTY DRAWING ROOM

Amid the brocade's dimness
the mahogany suite continues
its everlasting conversation.
The daguerreotypes tell their lie:
a false nearness
of old age cloistered in a mirror,
and when we look hard they elude us
like pointless dates
of murky anniversaries.
With a blurred gesture
their anxious almost-voice
runs after our souls
more than half a century late
and there it's scarcely reached
the first mornings of our childhood.
Actuality, ceaseless
ruddy, and beyond doubt,
celebrates in the street's traffic
its unassailable abundance
of present apotheosis,
while the light
slices through the windowpanes
and humbles the senile armchairs
and corners and strangles
the shriveled voice
of these ancestors


Jorge Luis Borges





Well, I have to feature Luis Gottandi's post, because it's almost as poetic as the Borges himself...:

Things conspire to keep us from gawking at the deterministic accident of our lives -- and others'.

The way time folds, like an opening curtain pulled back, from whence the exposure is made until the image is unreadable, or our eyes too gone to read it.

The unspeakable fear so many have that perhaps this is not so egalitarian, and that who we are might define the horizon line of what we can see, that maybe talent cuts education, and salesmanship trumps all the other suites.

Or it could be that we will find out that Atget froze to death in a drawer... Brady died penniless, without any of his pictures...Francesca Woodman walked into thin air at 22...as an old man, Stieglitz wondered one afternoon how long he would have to go without eating so he could afford a copy of The Steerage again. He died without one.

The vacant bliss of sticking strictly to the images and a gunslinger mentality can not be underestimated.

--- Luis

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Mohammadreza Mirzaei


The other day I got an email from a young Iranian photographer Mohammadreza Mirzaei for some help with a magazine article he is putting together. However, in his email he had a link to his own work.

I must say that I rather like some of it. While his Humans project isn't quite my thing, it does have a certain appeal.


I did however really like the Wall (make sure you click for bigger pictures - the little squares don't do them justice). There is a long photographic tradition of the frame being broken by a strong vertical - a tree or a post or such - going back at least to Atget and probably before that.


I should add - kudos for his website - I like the graphic, simple, yet slightly quirky design. Would that more photographers websites were like this

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction

I don't think Walter Benjamin was quite right in his essay The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction although the gist of it still stands, but either way, after Jen Bekman's prodding I'm considering following Julian Thomas' lead and offering an edition of affordable art for sale. And don't worry, the aura of the authentic original will be detectable as you hold the print in your hand...

So stay tuned
PS - if anyone's aggregate/feed popped up with a post detailing the edition, I accidentally published rather than saved a rough draft last night - doh... keep your eyes peeled Monday

Ben Lifson on Sugimoto and art


I'll try not to make it Sugimoto week on here, but while writing the last post about Sugimoto, I came across a post on the OpenPhotographyForums by critic and writer Ben Lifson. The context is a (somewhat cynical) discussion about contemporary photographic art in general and Sugimoto in particular.



It's well worth reading (Lifson's post is about half way down). Ben is someone whose criticisms and conversations I've always enjoyed and benefited from - I've extracted a big chunk here - the highlighted emphases are mine:

"THE GENERAL THRUST OF THIS DISCUSSION IS ACCURATE AND IMPORTANT WITH RESPECT TO A LARGE PART OF THE CURRENT PHOTOGRAPHIC MARKET, THE CURRENT PHOTOGRAPHIC SCENE.

But, I believe, Sugimoto is the wrong example.

I feel that he is being unfairly judged here... Sugimoto is really quite good.

I haven't seen these new pictures but my direct knowledge of theoriginal works of his other series leads me to believe that these new pictures, of shadows, also have the same excellences that have made him a strong artist with a specific vision that holds much comfort and reassurance for us in these chaotic and deeply troubling times...
Sugimoto makes it look as though it were easy, as though the truths about space, light, recession, projection, the geometry within the rectangle and its relation to the geometry of rectangles, the relationship between the momentary and the eternal which he reveals to us in each picture...Each time different... He makes it look as though these things can be seen and felt by everyone all the time.


I emphasize "felt" because I know from my personal experience with his original works that after only a few seconds of quiet, calm, concentrated looking at them -- leaving one's prejudices and even thoughts behind -- one begins to feel things, a kind of calm, a kind of excited calm, a kind of anticipation of a mystery about to be revealed... A feeling that I've experienced only from his work although often in nature...

True, the things Sugimoto photographs are indeed present and visible all around us all the time, in any corner or on any wall one chooses to look at.

We pass them every day. We sit opposite them for half-hours at a time in airport waiting areas when our flight is delayed, we gaze at them over our computers at the wall opposite when we can't concentrate on our work for a while.

But do we see them?

Do we see them as precisely as Sugimoto has?

Do we know precisely where the edges are, that is, where the unity, the coherence, the integration, the eloquence, the disclosed mystery of this particular patch of the universe ends, the boundary across which the order is engulfed by what seems like a chaos until, with Sugimnoto's eyes, heart, intelligence, literacy, etc. we see where the next set of edges is?...

No. Sugimoto's is not fake art made real by the pricing mechanisms of the market and the greed of investors for rich future returns.

Sugimoto's art is real art that has had the good luck to be recognized as such by the market and given good prices so that Sugimoto can keep making it and be sustained, in part, by the gratification that is given artists by recognition and reputation...
It is absolutely correct with respect to much of what is going on,
not only in photography but in painting, sculpture, performance art, conceptual art, drawing, etc...

But we must be careful not to throw out the good artists like Sugimoto with the empty ones.

I was with a good and very well known German artist yesterday who characterized much of what is going on in the art capitals of New York, London, Paris and Berlin as "Pretentousness" which says only "I NEED, I NEED, I NEED, I NEED."

To which a young decorative artist I know and with whom I visited a lot of New York galleries a month ago added, "LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME"

Both artists agree that the general note is DESPERATION.

So Yes, we must continue this thread and analyze and observe and bring to bear on the situation our best intelligences...

BUT WE MUST BE CAREFUL not to judge the value of a work either way, good or bad, by two things: ONE, How much or how little it costs and TWO Whether we like it or not, i.e. our taste.

REMEMBER W. H. AUDEN'S FIVE VERDICTS, which express the difference between taste and judgment.

1. I see that this is good and I like it.

2. I see that this is good but I don't like it.

3. I see that this is good and I don't like it but I understand that with perseverance I could come to like it.****

4. I can see that this is trash and I don't like it.

5. I can see that this is trash, but I like it.

****Which is how I came to like Sugimoto's work: I could see that it was honest, true, clean, extremely well done etc but I didn't like it., I felt like many of you here, like So What? or something. But I could see that it was good. It took me five years of struggling against my dislike of and my prejudices against it to see just how good it was and then, one day, passing one print in a museum and being arrested by it, feeling how good it was, feeling all its feelings, and then knowing that it and its artist were, as Keats calls the Grecian Urn, "friends to man" and I embraced it and liked it. Just like some theorems in non-Euclidean geometry, some formulas in
organic chemistry, some projectiles that will get a satellite near enough to Venus to make photographs, some art is difficult to understand.

ben lifson

www.benlifson.com"


Ben also has a series of quite in-depth articles on

RAWworkflow

25x100 - Julian Thomas decides to give it a try


Well, it looks like Julian Thomas has moved from cautious scepticism to experimentation.

He's decided to offer affordable editions of small prints a la Bekman's 20x200 (oh and don't blame Julian for the title above - that's all my doing)

His first offering a 4x12 print of this image from his ‘Three Part Inventions’ series for only 25 Euros (click on it to enlarge). Imo that's a bargain for great piece of work.

And hey - the guy makes his art with an ancient Rollei TLR that needs more coddling and tender care than Paris Hilton, so pony up and help him buy a backup....

And believe me, one day you won't be able to afford even a 4x6 of one of Julian's prints, so grab em while you can. You can contact Julian here

Monday, June 11, 2007

The Romance Industry - John Gossage


I first came across John Gossage's Venice/Maghera work in a compendium volume Identificazione di un Paesagio which originated with Sandro Mescola of the Comune di Venezia as a research project on the industrial transformation of the city of Venice. The aim of the project was to photograph “the substantial economic and social changes underway in its industrial areas.” Mescola assemble an A team of foreign photographers to depict the region - Baltz, James, Shore, Gossage, Shibata, Gohlke, Hütte etc

As I understand it, out of the volume of work that John Gossage produced for the project, he went on to put together the (fairly hefty, but not as big as Berlin in the Time of the Wall) book The Romance Industry.



In many ways this is probably my favorite of all Gossage's books (or at least those I've laid my hands on). It's also beautifully put together by Nazraeli

I'd have to say that while irony seems one of the marks of so much contemporary photography, the only seriously ironic aspect of the book is it's title - and while that throws a light veil over the whole thing, it doesn't seem a major preoccupation.




Reading through the book there are times when Gossage’s pictures can seem quite "harsh" (which is the best word I can find- perhaps "unforgiving"?) - although less so than much of the Berlin work, which I also happen to find quite melancholic. And The Pond could almost be defined as pure deadpan - despite the gentle mediation of it's journey. But while The Romance Industry certainly does has something of an unblinking view I find it to be much lighter in touch than both these books - almost gentler. It may not actually be romantic - far from it - but it is certainly poetic. Though the sort of poetry that - as John Berger describes it - does hard labour. It feels as if the deadpan, irony and melancholy have given way to certain level of fondness or affection.




I find I get a real sense of Gossage's intrigue as he delves deeper and deeper into the places and things he discovers in his investigation.



There are a number of pictures in the book which are some my favourites (at best I could only find some of them in Photoeye's booktease - there aren't many pictures online from this project at all - so some here I've plucked from other work) - incongruously, sheep enveloping a mound in the industrial area; the whole series Contents of a Laboratory (which allowed me to make an obvious but previously unmade connection for me between the approach to my museum and archives work and my personal work); an abandoned industrial area seen through a grid; the landscapes of various "wastelands", a man on a bicycle, both going and returning and perhaps the one truly romantic photogrpah in the book - an ivy covered staircase - and several more...



In an essay for the book, Gus Blaisdell uses a sort of via negativa putting forward a series of propositions about what John Gossage's work isn't, linking it to photographers "with whom he shares a similarly, but an even deeper difference" (and I'm going to borrow the whole section...):

NOT(atmospheric erosion like lichen clocks the head of Pan at Versailles; autumn leaves fallen on steps that descend semicircularly to a circular landing and then continue their descent; the archeology of streets and buildings presented after a terminal moraine has melted): Atget
NOT(the American commonplace so quietly essential as to seem beyond the ability of photography or any other medium to capture, within the reach of nothing but admiration): Evans
NOT(the drama of the hard travellin' road after Whitman and Kerouac in outsider eyes where the lights are always going down, leaving only the ghostlighted stage of the photograph): Frank
NOT(still going down, even Beat-ing it down to its basic beat-i-tude, the discovery of structure where mirrors crack the picture planes into what can be seen front and back and behind and beside, or a vegetal equivalent of abstract expressionist scrawl block the picture surface - a genre of delirious possibility, but still anchored in the often rigid permanence of what looks like asides and throwaways): Friedlander
NOT(a gaze as steady as Buster Keaton's wonders whether the industrial parks depicted manufacture pantyhose or megadeath; hip beyond irony or cool; where what passes for the so-called art world bleeds and leaks itself seamlessly in so called-real world): Baltz
NOT(a metropolis constructed by people for their discomfort, and in turn refuse to reflect them in its curtain walls, eyes more alienated than Antonioni's - eyes of an American veteran who returned with Vietnam locked in behind eyes that for years photographed without film or camera- eyes that stare at the traces of homelessness and the violence of wasted shooting sites where doll's heads hang for targets. Whether we edify or degrade we first create ruins, like Olympic sites once the games are gone and the local economy begins an unending hemorrhage): Hernadez
NOT(the outrage rightly registered at the sight of a few trees that survive on the freeway of Laos Angeles or the stupefied faces of people on terms with the thermonuclear unconscious of Rocky Flats): R. Adams

And certainly not the lush monumentality declared only photographically: A Adams.
Nor hermetic beauties of a zen-inspired series of pictures, a variation of equivalences; but equivalent to what in the world: M White

... Not far away from Weegeee's crime scenes with the bodies and gawkers removed. All the stains in the street and the curbside trash remains. Nature for Gossage is a place bristling with the attractive repulsion of armpits and crotches, and it is always alive, about to declare its animation, the shrubbery like David Lynch's trees tossed in a night wind, violated by a motion characteristic of anxiety, dread and agony. Premonition and foreboding settle in around Gossage as atmospherically as Atget's groundfogs in his parks.




I've come full circle hinting what Gossage photographs might be... Like Wallace Stevens in "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird," I collapse, loaf and invite my soul, unable to decide which I prefer, inflections or innuendoes' "The blackbird whistling/Or just after.""

Gus Blaisdell