From an essay by Linda Levitt:
Without the context of their accompanying text, the photographs in Joel Sternfeld’s On This Site: Landscape in Memoriam could easily be misread as what they only appear to be: serene images of the urban, suburban, or rural landscape. Each of the fifty photographs is placed on a right-hand page of the book. Sternfeld’s concise, sometimes terse text is placed on the facing page of each photograph, contextualizing the image as a site of tragedy. Some of the images, like the corner of Austin Street in Kew Gardens where Kitty Genovese was stabbed to death in 1964, are hauntingly familiar. Others are more obscure, and the viewer is at a loss to make meaning beyond the significance of the image itself.
The first photograph Sternfeld made for the book is an image of the crab apple tree in Central Park under which Jennifer Levin’s body was found on the morning of August 26, 1986. The photograph appears to have been made at dawn, and the scene is awash in warm morning light. Although not centered in the frame, the tree itself is the focal point of the image. Sternfeld says he “went to Central Park to find the place behind the Metropolitan Museum of Art where Jennifer Levin had been killed. It was bewildering to find a scene so beautiful…to see the same sunlight pour down indifferently on the earth.” There is no visible trace of the horror that marks this site; Sternfeld’s perception of the space is colored by the memory he carries with him to Central Park. The viewer too is confronted by the beautiful scene Sternfeld captures: how the photograph comes to mean depends on whether the viewer is, like Sternfeld, haunted by the specter of Levin’s murder. “As the fascination that photographs exercise is a reminder of death, it is also an invitation to sentimentality,” writes Susan Sontag. “Photographs turn the past into an object of tender regard, scrambling moral distinctions and disarming historical judgments by the generalized pathos of looking at time past.” If the past is “an object of tender regard,” then we bring a dual sensibility to Sternfeld’s photographs: a kind of nostalgia for the familiar, but one that carries with it a trace of the familiar as catastrophic. more
"When I started following my map, I found things that I never imagined I would find nearly fifty years after the murders took place. There are very few things that remain, and they are very hard to find, but I found some very interesting things that will show up in the photographs. My research and imagination are helping me to fill in the blanks.""
And then, of course, there is the grandfather of them all, Roger Fenton
9 comments:
Simon Norfolk might interest you too then?
http://www.simonnorfolk.com/
In particular 'For most of it I have no words: Genocide, Landscape, Memory'.
In addition to Norfolk's work on concentration camps, Serbia, Afganistan etc., you can check out Bart Michels, who shows at Foley Gallery, and photo European battle sites.
http://www.foleygallery.com/artists/artist_ins.php3?artist=9
Thanks Adam
that's one I was defiantily thinking of
f:lux - I'm meaning to do a seperate post on Norfolk (and maybe Michiels too)
I saw the most amazing exhibit on this subject in the eighties, taken with a WA pinhole camera of murder and violent crime sites. Unfortunately, don't remember name, but it succeeded because the pictures themselves (even w/o the accompanying info) were darkly eery, foreboding and dramatic compositions.
Hi Tim,
One of the earliest, if not the first (Roger Fenton - Crimea ?) to do this type of image making was George N. Barnard (1819 - 1902), who photographed scenes from and the aftermath of Shermans campaign in the American Cival War.
One in particular is titled 'Scene of Gen. McPhersons death'. With only the skull and bones of a horse lying by some woodland. Photographed well after the event.
seoras
This idea has been in my consciousness lately. It is quite an amazing concept, but to understand it, one must know more about the images that they are looking at. If they understand and know the context that photograph can succeed, if not, the photographs may not be strong enough to stand on their own.
The thing is, an awful lot of good photographs depend on context - either personal/cultural or historical and in a way, us knowing the many words that have been written about what they depict.
If you take any of those "10 greatest photographs" type threads - an awful lot of them don't actually stand up that well if you had know idea what they were about
thanks seoras - if I were to write a more extended post, I'd probably take it back to there.
I've always been impressed by Fenton's work and some of the civil war photographers. Of course technology generally forced them to make their (at times quite powerful) photographs of war without actually being able to show it.
Welcome back, Tim, you were missed.
The absorbency of The Earth is a salient point in these pics. Life goes on. Human meanness, pain and stupidity come and go. They, too, are ephemera. The Earth will outlive us.
Conceptually, these images work as visual captions for things we know about mostly from text, mug shots, or pictures of the deceased.
This is a reversal from the usual order of things, wherein a photograph has many floating potential histories until captioned. Here, the text has had many potential visual histories until now.
The photos collapse that into one, and illustrate that this relationship between words and seeing is commutative.
--- Luis
Post a Comment